NOT KNOWN FACTS ABOUT TORT AND CONTRACT LAW CASES

Not known Facts About tort and contract law cases

Not known Facts About tort and contract law cases

Blog Article

refers to the landmark case decided through the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Below’s a brief overview:

A result of the recent amendment, the court imposed a more severe sentence than would have been doable under the previous version with the legislation.

These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, marketing a more informed and just society.

Even though there is not any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds small sway. Still, if there is no precedent in the home state, relevant case regulation from another state may be regarded as from the court.

“Guaranteeing the precision of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple dependable sources is essential for reliable legal research.”

Reasonable grounds are available around the record to attach the petitioner with the commission in the alleged offence. Though punishment of the alleged offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. nonetheless figured out Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising outside of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is while in the credit of your petitioner as accused, therefore, case of your petitioner falls inside the exception where bail cannot be granted even in the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, guidance has become sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion on the same is hereby reproduced:

96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's well-settled that when taking into consideration the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to look at the merit of all of the qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these eligible candidates who're found being most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked by the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy within the part with the respondent department.

The Court considered the case to become maintainable under Article 184 (3) For the reason that Risk and encroachment alleged were for instance to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.

The prosecution presented substantial evidence, like eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature in the seized currency.

This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station on account of probable health risks and hazards.

                                                                  

Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by legislation." It can be nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that might be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but isn't binding precedent.

The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and opportunity hazard to local residents. Eventually, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, although observing the general trend supports that electromagnetic fields have detrimental effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should adopt the precautionary principle established out while in check here the 1992 Rio Declaration around the Environment and Development, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The dearth of full scientific certainty should not be used being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.

Report this page